There’s a pig on our
coffee table. It’s no ordinary pig because it has wings, but then any pig in
Saudi Arabia is extraordinary.
You see in this country pigs are haram or forbidden. Their meat is considered impure and so no one eats pork or any pork derivative. Not surprisingly, images and references
to pigs are also absent in wider social settings. For instance we walked through
Hamley’s toy shop not so long ago, and saw children’s kitty banks, froggy
banks, and cow banks. Piggy banks were notable by their absence.
As a result there’s a whole mine field of political correctness
that needs to be very carefully navigated. Here’s an example of the sort of
thing I mean. When teaching, I had to choose books to read to my class of nine year olds. I knew they’d be a mixture of
nationalities with the majority of Arabic descent. As a teacher I’ve always
loved reading to children, so choosing a book to read aloud is something I do
with care. More care here I realised
pretty quickly, than I'd anticipated.
My first thought was Charlotte’s Web, the children’s classic by
E.B. White. But among the raft of animal characters is Wilbur, a pig. And any
book which ends with a spider’s web spelling out the words “some pig”, thus
turning Wilbur into the hero of the story, was not going be a comfortable
choice. I thought again: this time Lady Lollipop, by Dick King-Smith, an easy
read with the sort of scatological humour bound to appeal to nine years olds.
It’s all about a spoilt young princess who desperately wants a pet pig for her
birthday. Her parents, the King and Queen, demand that she toilet train it
before it can come and live with her in the palace. At about this point I
realized I'd hit another non-starter. And I won't mention either how quickly
The Sheep-Pig, another Dick King -Smith, entered and exited my mind.
Another book I’ve loved reading to children in different schools
and countries is The House of Sixty Fathers by Meindert DeJong, set in China
during World War II. The protagonist is a small boy, Tien Pao, who becomes
separated from his parents when the invading Japanese descend upon his village. In the face of great danger, he arduously makes his
way back to his parents and is ultimately reunited. It's part adventure and
part human interest and beautifully written. All of which would be great, if it
wasn’t for the fact that Tien Pao makes his long foot journey with the family
pig, Glory of the Republic, making him as important to the story as Tien Pao.
Another non-starter.After also discarding my favourite poems, Roald Dahl’s Revolting
Rhymes and his version of The Three Little Pigs, I did eventually make a safe
choice: The Magician’s Nephew by C.S. Lewis. It’s the first of The Chronicle of
Narnia series and prequel to The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. The only
animal in it is an elderly cab horse named Strawberry, so I felt confident that
here at last, I was on safe ground.
It’s a funny thing, though. Despite one’s best intention to be culturally
sensitive, the tables sometimes turn. I remember one day setting a small poetic
task. The children had to write a simple acrostic poem describing an animal. It
would be a little like a riddle, but with only one word per line, which in
totality made a simple sentence.
And here’s the poem that I liked the best:
Pink
Is
Great
Fatima smiled as she handed me her
writing and I smiled too as I read it. I’m pretty sure that the only pigs she’d ever
seen were the sort found in picture books, rather like the one on my coffee
table. And nothing at all like a real New Zealand Kunekune pig.
I had an interesting conversation with an Egyptian Arab lady regarding Muslim beliefs regarding pigs and western sensitivity toward pig references. She said that they may not touch or eat pigs (and their products). There is nothing wrong with them referring to pigs in poems or literature or even just having a general conversation about them. This was after I had done "This little piggy" on my son's toes and made a comment about not wanting to be offensive.
ReplyDeleteAny story where the pig is glorified, however, might be shaky ground...so I'm glad you were rather safe than sorry! 😄
You didn't get any feedback on the heavily disguised allegorical and metaphorical references in the CS Lewis book??? 😜
I guess that trying hard not to cause offense means you naturally err on the cautious side. For instance, one thing I didn't refer to in this blog was an art lesson where the children were meant to create a line drawing of a pig. I didn't do this either because it just felt wrong.
DeleteAnd no, the secondary level of meaning in the Narnia stories is not something that ever came up. Probably a good thing!
Thanks for your interesting feedback... all food for thought!